Alexis Schroeder

Social Entrepreneurship and a New, Wiser Economy

Good Magazine

Do GOOD, like the San Francisco-based magazine that promotes social entrepreneurship

In my last post for BostInno, I wrote about simple, potentially transformative ideas and how they’re much easier said (and read and appreciated) than done (think absorbed or implemented). To me, social entrepreneurship feels like another one of these simple, but not-so-simple concepts. It’s a relatively new term — having first hit the scene in the 60s and 70s, gaining speed in the 90s due in large part to Bill Drayton — for what is certainly a major global trend, and still its meaning can easily get lost.

Hear a term often enough in many different circles and contexts and that term can begin to lose its intended impact.

So what exactly is social entrepreneurship? What does it look like? How do we know these companies are doing more good than harm in the long-run? What are some measures of success? These are just a few questions that typically come up in conversation around social entrepreneurship.

In essence, social enterprises are entrepreneurial ventures with the aim of solving one or more societal problems.

Social entrepreneurs seek to build companies that create jobs and turn a profit while also helping to cure social ills like poverty, hunger, disease, pollution—any number of things that have a negative effect on a particular group of people as well as the whole of society. They face unique challenges in growing their businesses and often partner with foundations, nonprofits, and corporations to accomplish their goals.

That said, I believe social entrepreneurship is best explained by way of example.

One fairly well-known example of a successful social enterprise is Toms Shoes, founded by Blake Mycoskie. Buy a pair of Toms and another pair goes to a child in need. In return for a stylish pair of shoes, Toms gives customers a relatable, concrete way to give back. For young people who wish to “make a difference,” but don’t have a lot of money, buying a pair of shoes for $40-100 is usually doable. Just as Mycoskie does things differently with his business model, he has a unique work and management style, too. Earlier this month he was featured in Inc. Magazine’s “The Way I Work” blog, in which he discusses his role within the company and why he takes a few months “off” each year.

A bit closer to home is Boston-based Common Soles, another, smaller footwear company that reinvests a portion of its profits into community infrastructure in the regions where its products are made.

Another example of a social enterprise is a Boston-based company called Prosperity Candle. This company partners with women entrepreneurs in distressed regions of the world and brings them into a unique profit-sharing model in which they earn well above a living wage. Through their work, Prosperity Candle builds a network of women entrepreneurs who then support one another. The ripple effects of their work go far beyond what we can even imagine.

Looking for more examples of social enterprises? Or perhaps answers to some of the trickier questions about the field?

A new crop of media companies sharing the stories of these enterprises have sprung up in recent years. While they’re each a bit different in terms of purpose, Ashoka’s Changemakers, Changents, GOOD Magazine, Beyond Profit Magazine, and Social Edge are all tremendous resources. One of personal favorites, founded in 2003, is The Stanford Social Innovation Review (SSIR). Many of these media companies are social enterprises in their own right, the only difference being that their product is information.

What’s the challenge/opportunity here?

Instead of buying goods and services without thinking about the impact of our purchases, why not learn about companies that meet our needs while also doing good in the world? It’s a myth that we’ll automatically pay more. And as we build new companies in order to re-build our economy, why not grow and invest in companies that create new possibilities for people?

Our potential here is unlimited.

What are your thoughts on social entrepreneurship? Who are your favorite socially-conscious Boston-area startups? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Alexis is a freelance writer and editor and co-founder of The New Prosperity Initiative (NPi), a media organization dedicated to knowledge sharing in the social justice field. Lex serves on the board of directors of The Writers’ Room of Boston, is a “Connector” for Boston World Partnerships, and holds a B.A. in Government from Smith College.

Tags:

  • You should look at two Boston companies/platforms for raising money for charities and other social programs. FirstGiving www.firstgiving.com) and BiddingforGood (www.biddingforgood.com) have been around the block and getting new leases on life with fresh capital.
  • Kmcgraw
    when is GOOD launching a Boston office?! great magazine.
  • Seth Hayward
    Thanks, Alexis. Great article.

    I can't help but agree with every point here - social entrepreneurship is a simple concept - yet very hard to really pin down. A lot of companies participate in what can be called social entrepreneurship - Toms Shoes is a great example, but also the peer-to-peer lending companies are another (Kiva, Prosper, LendingTree, etc.)

    The issue is that some companies give back more than others - I believe that is Martin's point. But I think that point is moot - in a time when we have a large distrust of "too big too fail" companies, any company that strives to give back (even in small amounts) is worth supporting. Certainly Toms, and others, could be doing their job better - there is no such thing as "perfect" organization - but by trying something different they are setting a good example for other socially aware entrepreneurs. They deserve kudos for that.

    Thanks again!
  • Love the article, Lex, and Montero's take on Tom's Shoes. Montero is so intense (in a v.good way!) and spot on about what social enterprise and true conscious capitalism mean.

    In reading your article, I'm reminded of Dutch Leonard's description of a true social enterprise as an organization in which the income-producing activities don't just generate funds to serve the social purpose, but the activities in and of themselves serve and advance the mission. I know personally I was buoyed by this description because the multiple streams of income I envision for my social enterprise will do both ~ raise funds to keep Time Well Spent in business (once I get the seed funding that is!) AND support the mission of helping people to live with mindful awareness of the impact of their daily lifestyle and consumer choices on quality of life for self, those in need and the environment.

    (FYI, here's a 2008 interview w/Dutch, second half of which addresses social entrepreneurship, entire interview is worth a look, imho: http://bit.ly/dutchleonard08 )

    I still have miles to go with Time Well Spent, but the efforts of all the organizations you listed to help spread the word and educate people about social enterprise will help! Most of all, I feel so strongly about empowering people to use the individual and collective power of their choices to impact change. After all, capitalism is consumer driven. Therefore, conscious capitalism (which I see as an ultimate goal for our economy as the key to a more enlightened future for all) will only truly be realized when consumers, conscious consumers, demand it. And, of course, that begins with education and empowerment ~ that which you and others like you are doing through your writing and connecting.

    I could go on (and already have...) but I'll stop myself! I encourage all of your readers to connect with the organizations you've mentioned and, of course, to follow the likes of folks like you and Montero on twitter, in cyberworld in general, and in person.

    Very exciting stuff!

    Folks interested can learn more about Time Well Spent online as well, of course. All positive thoughts and energy, as well as constructive criticism and questions, are welcome and encouraged.

    Carpe Diem ~
    Nancy Darcy Gallant
    Founder of Time Well Spent
    An Eco-Arts & Creative Repurposing Community Enrichment Center
    (Currently in its pre-launch phase on Boston's North Shore)

    https://twitter.com/NancyTWS
    http://www.facebook.com/TimeWellSpent
    http://twsblog.wordpress.com/
  • This is a really great article! well done Lex!

    There is one thing that I don't see fitting here. TOMS shoes. They are not a social enterprise. Their model is pretty clear cut old school corporate philanthropy model.

    It is troubling that no one at TOMS will reveal who is making the shoes & how much they get paid? We know they are made in China. Are TOMS shoes for kids made by kids? Is there sweat shop labor involved? I've seen these questions asked a few times very directly to Blake during Q&As after his talks and he very charmingly dodged the questions.

    Also there is a substantial difference between what TOMS does and what social entrepreneurship is. The TOMS model is charity entrepreneurship not social entrepreneurship.

    TOMS charges affluent americans a lot of money for their very inexpensive to produce shoes then donates part of the profits to donate shoes to the poor. That is charity. sustainable charity, powered by entrepreneurship. Yet still just charity. aka Corporate philanthropy. Corp A makes a lot of money selling their widget and chooses to use part of it's profits to support a good cause. Some do it more directly than others.

    If TOMS where to do social entrepreneurship they would be going into the villages where these drops are made and hiring the locals to make the shoes to sell to the rich Americans and grown their own local economies then they could afford to buy what ever shoe they wanted or needed. Much like what www.oliberte.com does or what common soles or prosperity candle does.
blog comments powered by Disqus