Chase Garbarino

Dave McClure Keeps it Real on Boston Startup Panels

Dave McClure: A great leader for Boston founders

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of hearing Dave McClure speak twice in Cambridge: First, at Dogpatch Labs, and later, at the MIT Stata Center. If you don’t know of Dave, he describes himself as “a sh***y coder in the ’80s, a crappy entrepreneur in the ’90s, a decent startup marketer, and a pretty good angel investor.”

If you were unable to attend either of the events, you can watch them at the bottom of this post in a pair of videos courtesy of our pals over at DartBoston.

If you are a softy when it comes to bad language and keepin’ it real, then Dave’s talks probably aren’t for you. After a year full of stodgy, white-haired, B.S. “networking” events here in the Bay State, I have to say hearing Dave mix in a few F-bombs with truly insightful “Web 2.0″ startup advice was a breath of fresh air.

Over the past nine months or so, there has been a startup “renaissance,” to quote Oneforty founder and CEO Laura Fitton from yesterday’s panel at the Stata Center. There have been plenty of events, mixers, “unconferences,” panels, blog posts, Tweets and a general tech-crazed orgy around re-energizing the startup economy here in Massachusetts.

Our team here at Pinyadda and BostInnovation recognizes that motion doesn’t necessarily signal progress, but we think that most of this stuff is really helping to nurture a wave of successful companies in the area. However, even with all the excitement and activity that has been percolating, the general theme of every event I go to tends to be about how there is no angel money to be raised in Boston.

While I agree that there is a dearth of Ron Conway- and Dave McClure-esque web startup “super angels,” there is still angel money to be had in the area. (We will be covering a number of companies on BostInnovation in the next few weeks who have raised angel money). I don’t have any hard numbers on how many companies have raised some sort of angel or seed financing, but we need to move our focus from whining about how the rich old guys in the area don’t understand Twitter and won’t open their wallets for young, inexperienced entrepreneurs. There is a group of people who, instead, are focusing on the things Dave McClure talked about at length at Dogpatch labs yesterday, which can be summarized in the following bullets:

  • Don’t write a business plan; start building something with no capital and see if it works.
  • If it works, put it out there and see if people use it.
  • Once there are new users coming to site/app relentlessly focus on seeing what features they use or don’t use and iterate constantly until you have something that is retaining a small user base.
  • Once you have people coming back to use your product regularly, focus tenaciously on a few marketing funnels to scale your user base and begin to figure out the appropriate balance between acquiring and monetizing users.

In reality, this methodology can be executed on the cheap.

Founders shouldn’t expect VCs to open up their checkbooks to fund this early activity because: 1) Founders should be able to do it without VC money. 2) VCs have bigger problems to worry about. And 3) many VCs in the area seem to sit on the sidelines because they don’t understand the importance of product and design issues as the foundation for successful marketing and growth. If VCs do see the importance of product development with regards to its effect on later-stage marketing, many want to wait to invest in order to mitigate product risk. Even after a company shows user traction, some East Coast VCs still expect to see an appropriate balance between a company’s cost-per-acquired user and the ability to monetize those users.

The only thing we web startup founders can hope for from VCs in the short term is that more of the East Coast firms look to do a larger number of small investments in early stage companies, and that they start following Dave McClure and others who focus on critical early-stage metrics rather than imaginary revenue projections. In the long term, if Boston founders continue to make products people use, help test one another’s products, and band together to share expertise, hopefully we will be able to educate more people in the community about early-stage investing, with some top-down assistance from VCs, in order to fuel more companies past the initial, most difficult stages.

To quote Laura Fitton, again from last night, we need to start “drinking for a living” more.  We need to make the community more open and far more casual — rather than devoting time and resources to crafting formal pitches and attending stale networking events. Let’s just drink some beer and get to know one another.

MIT Enterprise Forum video by DartBoston

Dogpatch Labs Talk video by DartBoston

Disclosure: Chase Garbarino is the Creator of BostInnovation and the CEO of Pinyadda.
What do you think about this method of creating web properties? Let us know in the comment section.

Tags: , ,

  • This is music to my ears.This is really a great post! Thanks for sharing. A blog really owes its success to its loyal readers and faithful followers.
    ________________________
    Natural Hair Products
  • Greyform2001
    Compilation of books recommended by Dave McClure

    http://www.tinkrbox.com/tb/box.jsp?b=xQOFL5S14ruO
  • Chase,
    I think you missed one more VERY important point Dave McClure made in his talk at the Dogpatch - stop chasing same darn 18 to 20-something demographic.

    I have to agree with him, because it is becoming exceedingly hard to remember web entrepreneurs after meeting them he in Boston. Why? How many times do you want to hear about the same lame Twitter app or social media "community". There are a lot of good markets/problems to chase, we just choose to pick the easiest ones, unsurprisingly, everyone else is chasing.
  • cgarb
    The point of the article wasn't to outline every good point McClure made, just the main thesis of how he goes about creating a company which I think is overlooked in the area.

    I agree to some degree about chasing the same demographic over and over again, but I disagree with you that everyone here is working on the same lame Twitter apps and social media communities. I think there are a ton of people here working to solve some tough problems and capitalize on big opportunities.
  • Chase,
    My comment was not criticism of your article. I was rather pointing out something a lot of folks don't want to hear in Boston and Dave nailed it.

    I was also pointing out that majority of the opportunities for entrepreneurs to socialize and cross-pollinate their network in Boston are only in those perceived to be "hot" areas. Don't believe me, than go ahead an count the number of events that have "social media" either in the title or description.

    You are right, there are groups of great people chasing the right problems, but because their stuff is not social media or a web apps, they are not considered "hot", so they simply stick in their circles and stay the heck away from the masses. That is very bad for the future of this community. Every week I meet someone F2F who tell me they are not going to the waste time on majority of the events, because all they will hear about is those "hot" areas.

    Don't want to end on the negative note though. It is good to see we are bring people from outside of our community to hear their point of view. We need that or we will fall into the groupthink trap.
  • cgarb
    Apollo - no worries criticism is fine, and even encouraged, I was simply explaining that my goal wasn't to touch on everything he discussed.

    I guess I am not understanding what you mean by people not in the "hot" areas working on good projects. Are you talking about people outside of web startups like clean tech, life sciences, etc? Or do you mean web startups focused on user bases such as kids or 55+ crowd like Dave McClure was talking about?
  • Both. Plus areas like enterprise software, NPOs, and etc. There are some special events for those groups, but only few of them each month and many are usually swamped with service providers.
  • Great points, Chase. I think really the key is "if you see a problem, figure out how YOU can help solve it." We need to step up and help each other in whatever way we can.

    As you suggest that means:
    - Party More: if you're around these events you know that it's far from a keg party and much of just entrepreneurs more relaxed than usual making deeper connections with other entrepreneurs than the typical 5 min power networking at traditional events.
    - Test each others stuff: if you're watching how your tool is developing...you might just have some valuable insight for another company's product/tool too. If we all become great testers for each other's stuff, all the products should be stronger for it.
    - Mentor: We can all be mentors in some way. Fan Bi and I have talked about this before; often the greatest value you get is from talking to people who are fighting the same problems and challenges as you right now. We still need people who have "been there before" to help with the big picture and provide input, but on a day to day basis, it's your fellow startupers that can really help.

    So maybe we don't have money...but we can do plenty of other things besides this.

    -Jason
  • getnicebos
    I love his bullet points...these steps are the logical and rational process for market viability and product exploration. No angel or VC wants to fund and idea that is still in the idea phase and hasn't been exposed to real world industry conditions.
blog comments powered by Disqus